4 votes0 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Layout/Graphics etc · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
27 votes16 comments · Adobe InDesign: SDK/Scripting Bugs and Features » Java Script · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Oh, and one more...
In long posts, especially those from the old forum that go back a year of more, you have to continually press the "more replies" button and scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll and (wait, wait for it...) scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll to read the most recent posts on the topic.
In the old forum, we could quickly jump to the most recent posts. Now we spend 2-3 minutes just scrolling to the most recent posts. And sometimes never get there!
In fact, fix many of the inadequacies of this new forum:
1. Separate out scripting InDesign and scripting Acrobat from the main forums.
2. Separate out LiveCycle and XFA forms from Acrobat main forum.
3. Get rid of the stupid, useless one line reply field.
4. Set the default sort by date, not relevance.
5. Rebuild the email announcement that comes with each new posting so that it doesn't contain the enormous graphic (which happens to be the top purely-decorative rule).
6. In the email announcement, have the subject line be consistent. We need to skim/scan the original post's subject line, not the most recent reply from someone. Today, my inbox had these subject lines:
-- Hi Phillip! Thank you.
-- Delete please.
-- Yes, just paste a screen shot.
-- Thank you so much.
-- Hi all!
As an ACP, this nonsense in the subject line prevents me from scanning for topics I'm helping someone with and providing follow up.
16 votes4 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Print/Packaging · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Lukas, I would love to work with you on this. Contact me off list.
—Bevi Chagnon | PubCom (accessibility experts)
It would be very helpful to be able to have an option the character style definition to automatically add expansion text to a word or acronym.
Example: the character style could have a field Expansion Text that the designer could select and fill in. Then, whenever the character style was used, the PDF would have the expansion text built into it for that text.
Here's a mock up of how the Export Tag settings in paragraph styles could look (see attached).
Sajeev S is talking about "custom tags" that end up in a PDF when it is exported from Adobe InDesign.
They are not the standard PDF tags as defined in ISO 32000 PDF standard. The custom tags cause so much trouble for those making accessible and PDF/UA compliant PDFs.
Adobe needs to make the standard PDF ISO 32000 tag set the default when a PDF is exported from InDesign, especially when the designer has deliberately defined the final tag in the InDesign paragraph styles Export Options.
Make the custom tags optional, not the default that they now are.
Adobe can fix this bug by adding a field in the Paragraph Styles Export Tagging dialogue that will allow those who need custom tags to set one. SEE attached graphic.
But the majority of PDFs (more tan 95%) need the standard tag set, not the crazy-named "custom" tags we get now.
See longer discussion at https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2643418
This is critically needed to automate numbered lists for technical documents, legal documents, and government publications.
Also ensure that when exported to accessible tagged pdf, the lists are correctly tagged.
8 votes3 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Text and Type · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
See this related post in the Acrobat User Forum:
The manual line break character from InDesign isn't Unicode compliant, which causes the PDF to fail in the accessibility checker.
7 votes1 comment · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Text and Type · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Not seeing this problem with versions 13.1 (CC:2018), and 14.0 and 14.1 (CC:2019).
We acknowledge that the issue is slowing you down and we regret the same.
Our investigation suggests that the issue lies in the latest update of Acrobat and there is little that can be done at our end to resolve the issue.
The problem has been communicated to the relevant team.
In the meanwhile we are closing this thread for InDesign.
At this time, the <Span> tags don't affect screen reader accessibility (SR's ignore them for now). I think that's also the case with other Assistive Technologies.
However, the PDF/UA standard is expanding and forthcoming releases will require much tighter control of tags, structure, nesting, etc. AND the <Span> tag could be used to convey valuable information to the user or technology, so we don't want it mis-used now and cause documents to fail in the future.
Adobe needs to correct this ASAP and ensure that <Span> tags are used appropriately (usually to designate visual formatting of the content) and not wrap them around every single element in the document.
14 votes2 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Layout/Graphics etc · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We need a Preflight definition for InDesign that checks for accessibility issues, such as:
1) Unicode (OpenType) fonts
2) Alt-text on graphics
3) Tags defined in the paragraph styles
4) Correct formatting of lists and tables
5) Color contrast
6) Metadata / File Info
7) Sequential hierarchical headings
I think table footnotes should be in the table footer section of the table so that:
1) They are part of the table, not the rest of the page content, and
2) They automatically repeat at the bottom of multi-page tables.
Right now, as folks have said, the table footnotes are separated from the actual table itself.
For accessibility, the footnote <Note> tags would be in the <TFoot> section within the <Table> tag.
The fix for this issue is now available in the latest update (14.0.2) of InDesign 2019.
If you are unable to see the update notification, open the menu (three dots) from the top-right of Creative Cloud desktop application and click on ‘Check For App Updates’.
Once the update button is shown against InDesign, click on the button to update to Id 14.0.2.
If you face any problems with the new update, do let us know in the comments.
The list of fixed issues can be found at: helpx.adobe.com/indesign/kb/fixed-issues.html
Adobe InDesign team
The ability to customized the Properties panel.
Different types of publishing workflows need a different set of tools. Examples: accessibility, XML/automated, digital only, print only.
Just as I can set up my own workspace of panels and their locations, I'd also like to remove some of the items in the current Properties panel because I can't use them in my workflow. And there are others buried under an expansion arrow that I need to access all the time.
Different strokes for different folks!
Please respond to the email sent by us for more information regarding this issue.
Adobe InDesign team