Andrewtb333
My feedback
74 results found
-
17 votesAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
15 votesAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
867 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrewtb333
commented
This thread is asking for the same functionality, I believe, so that would bring the votes up to 30!
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrewtb333
commented
There are actually a few ideas about this in the system but they are all worded differently. I for one would word this "Allow table rows to break across frames". Assuming I have understood the intent of this idea, of course. Perhaps they could all be consolidated?
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrewtb333
commented
This is very true. With all the new features InDesign has added over the years, the basic (and very useful) functionality of tables in InDesign hasn't really changed from its initial implementation back in what, 1999?. Not being able to split a row across frames is such a huge impediment to layout, and makes Word superior for table-heavy documents, sad to say.
Andrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
95 votesAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
The feature to “Preserve Filename on PDF Export” was introduced in InDesign 2019 in the PDF Export dialog.
The option is called “Use InDesign Document Name as the Output Filename”.Marking this Feature Request as Completed.
—
Adobe InDesign teamAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
176 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrewtb333
commented
I was doing some diagrams showing a rail line that had bridges over it. The bridges are shown as two parallel lines with white in the middle to cover the rail line. The ends of the bridge need to remain open, so no line. The only way of doing this at the moment is as a single cell table with borders on the left and right (which is what I used) or by drawing two lines and a white box and grouping them (not ideal). I'd post a screenshot but I can't see an option anywhere.
Andrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
528 votes
We have added this feature in our backlog for future release
Andrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
188 votes
Dear All,
This is fixed in latest InDesign CC version. Please upgrade to the latest release.
Thanks
Abhinav AgarwalAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Andrewtb333
commented
Yes! F4 is one of the most useful things in Word. Much of what I do in InDesign is one-off, so while I might use styles, I won't necessarily have shortcut keys set up for them. For a large amount of styles this would be impractical anyway. In Word I tend to go through and apply a style at a time: apply body, then click-F4-click-F4-click-F4 all the way to the end. Then back to the top, apply Bullet 1-F4-click-F4 etc. Very fast!
I have assigned F4 to "Transform Sequence Again Individually" for when I am doing org charts, as you can change the size of a box then change others to match. It would be good if this "transform again" functionality could be extended further to styles, manual text formatting, etc.
Andrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAndrewtb333
shared this idea
·
-
39 votesAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAndrewtb333
shared this idea
·
-
4 votesAndrewtb333
supported this idea
·
I was going to post something but just wanted to check your idea is the same as mine. Say your table header row is "Level 1" and coloured dark blue. You then have Level 2 subheading rows that occur often throughout a table, and are coloured a pale blue. When you go to page 2 of the table, you want it to start with the dark blue Level 1 as usual, and then repeat the last-used pale blue Level 2 row?
I often have tables that go on for pages at a time and although I need the main table header to show what each column is, I want the Level 2 rows to repeat so that the rows are in context (showing what grouping they belong to, which is the function of the pale blue rows).
At the moment I have to manually insert the pale blue row at the top of the next page, and if I add or delete rows before it, it ends up in the wrong position as it's not "locked" to the top of the page.