Andrewtb333

My feedback

  1. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Tables  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Bugs » Performance/Usability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  3. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  4. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Bugs » UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    Got my computer re-imaged with the latest Windows 10 so I could install 2019, and the palettes are still rolled up when ID opens. Why??

    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    Wow, I'm overwhelmed by the response. Extra info: this only happens when InDesign opens in full-screen mode: if it opens not maximised, the palettes are arranged how I left them.

    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Styles  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  7. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  10. 52 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  11. 30 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Scripting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    In case the latest comments don't make sense, they were in response to an Adobe person marking this as "solved" by suggesting that we could assign a shortcut key to one of the "transform" functions. That part of it seems to have disappeared (or not been part of the conversation here, as it announced itself via an email and a link to response let here).

    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    This isn’t really the same thing. Word can repeat something like “apply that paragraph style” or “insert a table row”. I already have F4 assigned to “transform again individually” or whatever it is so that if I move or resize an object I can repeat it, but it only applies in limited scenarios.

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  12. 15 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  13. 46 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  15. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    OK, imagine you're making a map and have everything on two layers: "Shapes" and "Text". Text is at the top. You make information bubbles that are always on top of everything else, which consist of a circle and a text box over it, on their respective layers. Group them so they are always moved together.

    We then later on make another layer called "Images" at the top and place images on it. We want the images to be on top of the shapes, but now they cover the information bubbles, which are supposed to be the topmost things. So create another layer called "Bubbles", select all the bubbles and drag them to the "Bubbles" layer which is now the top layer.

    The important thing here is that I have moved these grouped objects to a new layer, so in my mind they have been re-homed.

    Later on I decide that I want the proportions of the bubbles to be different, with a bigger circle but the text the same. I ungroup the objects, and any of them that are on top of an image now disappear because they have gone back to their original layers.

    My suggestion is that once a grouped object has been moved to a new layer, the objects it consists of should permanently be moved there and given the stack order that it had based on the previous layer assignments.

    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  16. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Bugs » UI  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 shared this idea  · 
  17. 39 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  18. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Bugs » Print/Packaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    Actually some of the settings do stick. The "Paper source" setting sticks, for instance, but "Offset jobs" and duplex settings don't.

    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    Confirmed, I have exactly the same issue, just with the Versant 80 but same Fiery ex-i. Never noticed it because I must have been working only on "new" documents before, and only just opened an old file now.

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  19. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Adobe InDesign: Bugs » Print/Packaging  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    Pretty sure I had this issue with a previous version of InDesign, and it went away. Appears to be back again. Perhaps reintroduced with ID 2018? I don't do a lot of printing from ID these days so it's hard to say.

    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    I've just had this with a Xerox Versant 80. All other apps work fine. If I go into the printer's dialog and change settings there, they are not saved. I can click ok, and go immediately back in and they are back to the defaults.

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
  20. 43 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Andrewtb333 commented  · 

    Yes! I can't think of why anyone would want it to behave the way it currently does.

    Andrewtb333 supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base