Skip to content

Rob Hutchings

My feedback

97 results found

  1. 324 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  2. 480 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  3. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  4. 24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings shared this idea  · 
  6. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  7. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  8. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  9. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  10. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    Appreciate this was posted back in 2018 so may need to create a separate request but would like to add here also as it is similar in nature.

    Find/Change dialog also needs to be able to ignore things like the pasteboard, but also hidden spreads! Currently a dialog prompting them to be unhidden causes the process to end if you don't want to unhide any spreads.

    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  11. 186 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  12. 42 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  13. 44 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  14. 19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  15. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    Still an issue on Windows 11 & InDesign 2025 (v20.2)

    On Windows, the issue might have something to do with the way Windows Explorer handles files when the preview option is active. If you open the file using explorer the existing file becomes locked by the preview and subsequently causes the file to revert to read-only in InDesign. This behaviour then seemingly continues to happen even without the file highlighted in Windows Explorer when performing Save as commands.

    Clearly this shouldn't be happening and Adobe & Microsoft need to find a solution. However for now, uncheck the preview if you open files using Windows Explorer. Once you relaunch InDesign after disabling preview all is well and behaves as it should.

    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  16. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Please help us with answers to the below queries:

    1. OS version of the machine where issue is reproducible.
    2.Are the files opened simultaneously by more than one user?
    3. Does the same file which is opened as Read Only in Id 14.0.2, when opened in Id 14.0.1 opens fine?
    4. Does remounting the SMB drive fixes the issue?

    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  17. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  18. 780 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  19. 110 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    BUMP!

    Any idea of a timeline for this @Adobe? How long does it take to conduct a review?!

    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
  20. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Fix for this issue is now available in the latest InDesign Release version 20.1 (Build 20.1.0.71), available via Creative Cloud Desktop application.


    Please update your InDesign application to this latest version to get the fix.


    --

    Adobe InDesign team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    Ozzie starting a new bug thread isn't gonna get it fixed any quicker mate go here and vote on this (if you haven't already):

    https://indesign.uservoice.com/forums/601180-adobe-indesign-bugs/suggestions/48982412-indesign-2025-won-t-lock-constrain-proportions

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    Just came back to see if the release of 20.0.1 has meant someone might be looking at this from Adobe. C'mon guys get on this already!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    I should add to this, I cannot remember the default behaviour previously but this could be a useful clue as to identifying the erroneous code. Each of the three locations above (Control, Transform & Properties Panel) each exhibit independent behaviour regarding the setting of these locks, where both Constrain proportions for width & height and the Constrain proportions for scaling are not updated and reflected in the other panels. This is not the case for the reference point and the other transformation settings such as flip rotate etc. where when you adjust one they all change in the other panels.

    Also this is not a Graphics/Images/Assets issue as it has been logged. It is a Performance/Usability & UI issue

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rob Hutchings commented  · 

    In both the Control Bar and the Properties panel, this was previously a toggle setting and you'd check it and forget. Now every object every once applied to one, as soon as you deselect the object, the setting resets. Not only that, and possibly related, my transform panel doesn't include the lock alongside the dimensions at all, it is only visible alongside the scale. The scale one seems to be able to remember it's setting, so this is clearly a bug.

    Possibly on an unconnected yet related note, resizing via entry of dimensions is ignoring the 'Adjust Stroke Weight when Scaling' option, but is honoured when scaling via percentage. This means I need to either work out the scale factor, or adjust manually by dragging while holding Shift and Control. Not ideal!

    Windows 11 system here.

    Rob Hutchings supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5

Feedback and Knowledge Base