Dean Morrison
My feedback
35 results found
-
10 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes0 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Cloud services (Typekit, CC Libraries etc) · Admin →Dean Morrison
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Dean Morrison
shared this idea
·
-
17 votes2 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Cloud services (Typekit, CC Libraries etc) · Admin →Dean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Dean Morrison
commented
I have noticed for the new Illustrator Share For Review that in my limited testing the image quality is much better than the Current InDesign. Hoping they can get InDesign up to the same level.
Dean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
16 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Share for Review is to quickly share a design that is still a work-in-progress with the Reviewer(s) for quick feedback. Since the review opens in a browser for the reviewer, it has to load quickly even on slow networks, that’s why the image quality has been kept low deliberately so that the page loads quickly without long wait times. Using high-res views will slow down the loading of pages in the browser considerably, marring the experience.
Hope this helps.
—
Adobe InDesign teamAn error occurred while saving the comment Dean Morrison
commented
It should be up to the user to determine the quality of images. I understand the desire to keep file sizes small for web views but there is also a balance where you can have decent quality images that are small. At he moment the compression that is being used is a bit extreme. The selling point for Adobe to make this possible is if the user decides they want higher quality images in the review the file size is bigger and thus they use more storage and may have to upgrade their storage equaling more money for Adobe.
-
4 votes2 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Cloud services (Typekit, CC Libraries etc) · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Dean Morrison
commented
Yes Please, this would be awesome. At first I thought the IDMS/Snippet files should be a self contained linked file but I understand it is meant for things you might not want to change in one document if the IDMS/Snippet file is updated.
I wonder if there could be a way to make it so when placing IDMS/Snippet that there is an option to remain linked to the file so if it is updated the placed file is also updated? Then there can be an option to break that link if needed.
Also It is kind of weird that you can not add a Snippet to CC Libraries from Bridge even though it is the same type of file. While I like to use the Libraries as much as possible it is also nice to have a separate file on the your hard drive for various reasons.
Dean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote0 comments · Adobe InDesign: Feature Requests » Cloud services (Typekit, CC Libraries etc) · Admin →Dean Morrison
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteDean Morrison
shared this idea
·
-
13 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesDean Morrison
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Dean Morrison
commented
The ability to save versions of the reviewed documents like how it works for Illustrator & Photoshop Share feature. At the moment we have two many different ways to Share/Review/Publish documents when it should all be the same between programs. The dream would be Something like InDesigns Publish Online (That has the ability to Pick Pages/spreads, set PDF quality, etc...) with the Share for Review Commenting tools added and then add in the Version History from AI/PSD.
So after some further testing I believe I have figured out the Issue. This is not really a bug but maybe something that could turn into an option.
Basically when you save the PNG from Illustrator (or Photoshop) the file is using a conversion based on the RGB or CMYK values which are affected by the Color Profile even if there is none assigned and not LAB even when the set colour mode is LAB. When You Export the file from InDesign whether the file is in RGB or CMYK mode it seems to use the LAB values to create the RGB.
Testing Color Pantone Warm Red
Values In the Color Swatch = R255 G68 B56 (When Switching from LAB to RGB)
CMYK Color Mode Illustrator PNG File = R239 G72 B62
RGB Color Mode Illustrator PNG File = R250 G66 B56 (close but still off)
InDesign PNG File = R255 G68 B56 -
Photoshop using the same linked ai files gives the same results as Illustrator.
So I guess the question is Why does InDesign use the LAB values while Illustrator & Photoshop Convert based on profile when Exporting PNG & JPGs. I understand why values are converted for print but it might be nice when exporting for screens to have some kind of option in Illustrator and Photoshop that if a placed Graphic has a Spot Color that it is recognized as such and the LAB values within that Spot colour are used. The whole point of using LAB is consistency.