Skip to content

Erick

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Erick supported this idea  · 
    Erick shared this idea  · 
  2. 922 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Erick supported this idea  · 
  3. 350 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Erick supported this idea  · 
  4. 63 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Erick commented  · 

    An application for which we pay substantial subscription fees should not be the place for publicity to use a service. It is enough to know that it exist and use it if we need to. Otherwise it should be out of our sight.

    Erick supported this idea  · 
  5. 136 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Erick supported this idea  · 
  6. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Erick commented  · 

    More precisions and screen shots. Please find a solution, this is very annoying.
    • Underlining disappears only if language is set to US English in the character panel as an override of the paragraph style which is set to UK English.
    • Unlike yesterday, the underlining comes back when language is set back to English UK.
    • This time it is also underscoring some plurals.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Erick commented  · 

    Precisions to my previous comment:
    • It seem to happen only when originally writing with a paragraph style set up to English UK.
    • Underlining disappears when overriding the text to English US
    • Underlining does not come back if removing paragraph style override back to English UK
    • Doing so on one paragraph seem to fix the whole document, but not sure.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Erick commented  · 

    For me, it is the past tense of verbs that get underlined. Proposed correct spelling shows the last letter split. For example, "distributed " is underlined and suggestion shows "distribute d"., or "comprises" shows "comp rises". I am using build 15.1.1

Feedback and Knowledge Base