Skip to content

Keith Hartman

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 799 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keith Hartman supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,011 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keith Hartman supported this idea  · 
  3. 18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keith Hartman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keith Hartman commented  · 

    This issue rides the fine line between being a bug and an "unimplemented feature". I don't think there is any user that expects groups to NOT allow selecting multiple objects . And when you find yourself going, "did I accidentally deselect that, or why can't I select both at once", it feels very much like a bug.

    Given that this is the behavior of Illustrator and Photoshop, it seems like an oversight, and a 9+ year old one at that. I tend to expect certain levels of feature parity between Adobe products, especially when I'm paying "state-of-the-art" subscription costs.

  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Keith Hartman shared this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Keith Hartman commented  · 

    This could be done by tracking the numeric weight (which is standardized) instead of the label of the weight (which is not standardized). CSS already does this. For example, Regular/Book is 400. If you switch to a font that uses the label Normal for that weight, it would just use that since its weight is also 400.

    Keith Hartman supported this idea  ·