Skip to content

David Hillel

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 388 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Hillel shared this idea  · 
  2. 216 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Hillel supported this idea  · 
  3. 184 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Hillel supported this idea  · 
  4. 341 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Hillel supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hillel commented  · 

    The current situation with InDesign's buggy shaping engine is unacceptable and poses significant risks:

    1. Lack of indicators: There are no clear signs when the buggy shaping engine is active.

    2. Hidden issues: It's impossible to detect these bugs within InDesign itself.

    3. Preference reset risks: If preferences are reset and the engine isn't changed back, it could lead to serious errors.

    4. Financial implications: Will Adobe compensate clients for missing characters in printed materials? A colleague had to reprint 2,000 copies of a cover due to this bug, incurring substantial costs.

    5. Loss of reliability: InDesign's motto used to be "What you see is what you get." Now, it's more accurate to say, "What you see is maybe what you get."

    This situation undermines InDesign's reliability and could have severe consequences for professionals who depend on its accuracy.

  5. 736 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    David Hillel supported this idea  · 
  6. 468 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    David Hillel commented  · 

    it's a shame we still not have a real modern text engine for RTL

    David Hillel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base