Skip to content

Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com commented  · 

    For more details about the problems with adding dictionaries, see this thread in the community forum https://community.adobe.com/t5/indesign/adding-welsh-language-to-indesign/m-p/12106925#M432977

    NIGHTMARE! Please correct the problems:
    -- location of the dictionaries has changed.
    -- Adobe's documentation is now out of date and useless.
    -- New dictionaries are no longer automatically recognized and installed. Must be done manually by the user.

    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com supported this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com commented  · 

    This has been changed by the ISO PDF/UA committee over the past couple of years.

    From the PDF/UA-1 syntax guide at https://www.pdfa.org/resource/tagged-pdf-best-practice-guide-syntax/

    4.2.7.1 example:

    <Note>
    <Lbl>
    <P>

    Think of the <Note> tag as a wrapper that contains the footnote's label and content, and possibly multiple <P> tags for lengthy, STEM and legal footnotes.

    So please correct the exported tag structure per the Syntax Guide.

    FYI, I have one sample footnote from government legislation that is 1.5 pages long, and contains many <P>, <L>, and <H2> tags in the single footnote.

  3. 40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com commented  · 

    Update ver. CC:2019 / 14.1

    TABLES:
    YOUR VOTE IS NEEDED — We still need the ability to designate row headers, ID tags, and scope.

    FOOTNOTES:
    Done in CC:2018!
    Footnotes that are created using InDesign's footnote utility (or correctly created in Word and imported correctly into InDesign) are correctly tagged <Note>, and positioned in the reading order at the end of the paragraph.

    Done in CC:2019! Table Footnotes are correctly tagged and placed after the <Table> tag.

    LINKS:
    VOTE FOR THIS — We need to be able to add Alt-Text to hyperlinks.

    ARTIFACTS:
    Be patient. This is being updated to comply with the forthcoming PDF 2.0 standard which will add the <Artifact> tag.

    ARTICLES:
    VOTE FOR THIS — The Articles panel doesn't do everything we need it to do. The panel meeds some major revisions to meet our accessibility requirements.

    TOC:
    Done in CC:2018!

    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com supported this idea  · 
  4. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Bevi Chagnon | PubCom.com commented  · 

    +1. Thanks for posting this suggestion.

Feedback and Knowledge Base