Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I believe multipliers are not allowed in the look ahead/behind syntax as they can make the confirmation match much to broad.

    In a search and replace scenario, I use sets to identify the targets so (?<=bc*)d would work like (?<=b)(c*)(d) if you identify your change onto $2 [assuming that c*($1) was not intended to change]

    $1newcontent

    This wouldn't work with a style change.

  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base