Does including bc in a Character Set, like:
work for you?
An error occurred while saving the commentAnonymous commented
I believe multipliers are not allowed in the look ahead/behind syntax as they can make the confirmation match much to broad.
In a search and replace scenario, I use sets to identify the targets so (?<=bc*)d would work like (?<=b)(c*)(d) if you identify your change onto $2 [assuming that c*($1) was not intended to change]
This wouldn't work with a style change.
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·