Skip to content

L

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    L supported this idea  · 
  2. 61 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    L supported this idea  · 
  3. 89 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    L supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    L commented  · 

    This limitation is still relevant in current versions of InDesign. It would be very useful to have explicit stacking/z-order controls not only between Paragraph Border and Paragraph Shading, but also between the shading of consecutive paragraphs.

    For example, I have a heading with an opaque white Paragraph Shading overlapping a coloured Paragraph Shading from the following paragraph. There is currently no way to make the heading shading render above the following paragraph shading, so the only workaround is to use anchored objects or manual masking.

    A simple “Shading/Border: In Front / Behind” option would make these layouts fully style-driven and much more robust in long editorial documents.

    L supported this idea  ·