Skip to content

GP

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GP commented  · 

    Adding to JP's request, if a print feature is added, could we save editorial comments? It would be nice for documentation or revision control. I'm thinking similar to the .fdf (forms data format) available within a PDF.

  2. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    GP commented  · 

    Agreed - this feature, at first take, seems like it'll make the review process much easier for me, but not my clients. It's forcing them to adopt something new, and they are not interested most of the time. Please eliminate the ID feature, or heck call it something else, or say "just need your email to confirm you're the intended recipient." I shared a test doc today with my teammates. They dread editorial reviews as it is, and the fact that they are asked for an ID or even a "login with ..." absolutely drives them bonkers.

    GP supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base